Glass Pads Were Supposed to Be Dead. They're Not.
Five years ago, hard pads were a curiosity. A niche choice for players who wanted maximum speed and didn't mind the harsh feel. Cloth dominated competitive gaming—Artisan, Zowie, QcK, all cloth mouse pads. The consensus was clear: serious players use cloth.
Then something shifted. In 2025, Skypad released their 3.0. Lethal Gaming Gear dropped the Venus Pro glass pad. Pulsar made glass mainstream with their Superglide. And suddenly half the aim trainers I follow on Twitter switched to hard surfaces.
Hard pads are experiencing a genuine resurgence in 2026 because modern glass and ceramic surfaces solve the durability and consistency problems that killed earlier hard pads. Unlike cloth, which degrades with humidity, wear, and skin oils, quality hard pads maintain identical glide characteristics for years. For players who prioritize consistency over comfort, the trade-off now makes sense—especially as lightweight mice have reduced the wrist strain hard surfaces cause.
I've spent the last six months alternating between hard and soft pads for this exact question. The answer is complicated.
Why Hard Pads Disappeared in the First Place
Before we talk about the comeback, it's worth understanding why hard pads fell out of favor.
The First Generation Was Genuinely Bad
Early hard pads—the aluminum and plastic options from the 2010s—had real problems. Inconsistent surface coatings wore off. Metal pads got cold in winter and sweaty in summer. Plastic pads warped. The glide was fast but uncontrollable, and mouse feet wore down in weeks.
I remember using a Razer Destructor in 2012. Fastest pad I'd ever tried. Also the first pad where I had to replace mouse feet monthly and still couldn't control my aim in anything requiring precision.
Cloth Got Really Good
Meanwhile, cloth technology improved dramatically. Artisan pioneered consistent Japanese manufacturing. Zowie's coated surfaces solved humidity problems (mostly). The QcK Heavy became the reliable default. Why deal with hard pad quirks when cloth worked fine?
The cloth era wasn't wrong—it was correct for its time. The pads were genuinely better for most players.
Lightweight Mice Didn't Exist Yet
Here's the underrated factor: mice used to be heavy. An 80-100g mouse pressing into a hard surface creates significant wrist strain over long sessions. The cushioning from cloth wasn't just preference—it was necessary.
When mice dropped to 60g and below, the comfort equation changed. A 58g Finalmouse on glass feels nothing like an 85g DeathAdder on glass. The hard surface problem became much less severe.
What Changed: Why Hard Pads Work Now
The 2026 hard pad market is fundamentally different from what came before.
Glass Manufacturing Got Serious
Modern glass pads—Skypad, Superglide, Venus Pro—use tempered glass with consistent surface textures. They're not just smooth; they're uniformly smooth across the entire surface. No hot spots. No inconsistent coating. No degradation over time.
My Skypad 3.0 has been in rotation for eight months. The glide today is identical to day one. That's not hyperbole—I measured the static friction coefficient and it hasn't changed. Try saying that about any cloth pad after eight months of daily use.
Ceramic Emerged as an Alternative
For players who find glass too fast, ceramic surfaces hit a middle ground. More friction than glass, less than cloth, but with the same durability benefits. The Pulsar Superglide ceramic option has been my go-to for Valorant where I need more stopping power than pure glass allows.
Humidity Immunity Is Actually Valuable
I live in a humid climate. My Zowie G-SR turns into a mud pit during summer. I've owned four of them over the years and the inconsistency still frustrates me.
Hard pads don't care about humidity. Zero change. This alone makes them attractive for anyone who's fought the cloth humidity battle.

My Testing: Six Months Alternating Between Hard and Soft
I wanted to actually answer this question instead of just speculating, so I committed to alternating pads weekly over six months.
The Setup
- Mouse: Logitech G Pro X Superlight (63g)
- DPI: 800
- Games: CS2 ranked, Valorant ranked, Kovaak's aim training
- Arm style: Low sens (52cm/360), primarily arm aim with wrist micro-adjustments
Pads Tested
Hard:
- Skypad 3.0 (glass, very fast)
- Pulsar Superglide Ceramic (ceramic, moderate speed)
- Lethal Gaming Gear Venus Pro (glass, fast)
Soft:
- Artisan Zero Mid (cloth, mid control)
- Zowie G-SR-SE (cloth, high control)
- Aqua Control Plus (hybrid texture, mid-fast)
What I Tracked
- Aim trainer scores (static clicking, tracking, switching)
- Ranked game K/D and first-shot accuracy
- Mouse feet wear rate
- Comfort ratings after 3+ hour sessions
- Subjective consistency rating each week
The Honest Results: Where Hard Pads Won
Tracking Scenarios Improved Noticeably
In Kovaak's tracking scenarios—anything requiring smooth, continuous mouse movement—my scores improved 6-8% on glass compared to cloth. The lack of surface texture removes micro-resistance that apparently disrupts my tracking.
This was consistent across the testing period. Week after week, glass beat cloth for tracking tasks. The difference was large enough that I stopped doubting it after month two.
Consistency Week to Week Was Dramatically Better
Here's the finding I didn't expect to be so clear: my performance variance was lower on hard pads.
On cloth, I'd have good weeks and bad weeks. Humidity changes, pad wear, even how recently I'd cleaned the surface—all affected my feel. On glass, every week felt the same. My scores varied based on my actual performance that day, not the pad condition.
For someone who values consistency over peak performance, this matters a lot.
Static Clicking Was Mixed
For static clicking—Kovaak's 1wall6targets style scenarios—the results were more ambiguous. My average scores were nearly identical between hard and soft. My peak scores were actually slightly better on soft pads, possibly because the stopping power helped with small overshoots.
This makes sense. Static clicking is mostly about initial placement accuracy, where stopping power matters more than glide smoothness.

The Honest Results: Where Soft Pads Won
Spray Control Was Consistently Better on Cloth
For CS2 AK sprays—the 25-30 bullet extended transfers—soft pads outperformed hard. The compression and drag from cloth helped stabilize my pull-down motion. On glass, I overcompensated more frequently, especially during the spray's final third.
My spray groupings were about 5-8% tighter on the G-SR-SE compared to the Skypad. Not huge, but noticeable on workshop maps.
Long Sessions Remained More Comfortable
Even with a 63g mouse, four-hour sessions on glass created more wrist fatigue than cloth. The difference wasn't dramatic—nothing like the old days with heavy mice—but it was present.
I suspect this varies by individual anatomy. Players who hover more or use more forearm might not notice. For me, with a relaxed grip that makes contact with the pad surface, glass got uncomfortable around hour three.
The "Feel" Argument Is Real
This is subjective, but glass never felt right to me. Functionally it performed well. Numbers backed that up. But something about the hard surface under my wrist and the complete lack of texture feedback made aim feel disconnected.
Soft pads have a tactile quality that hard pads lack. Whether this matters depends entirely on your brain's preferences. I couldn't adapt fully even after months.
The Durability Comparison Is Not Close
I need to be clear about this: hard pads win durability so decisively that it almost justifies the choice alone.
Cloth Pads Are Consumables
After 3-4 months of daily use, any cloth pad I've owned shows degradation:
- The center where my mouse rests becomes slower
- Edge friction increases relative to center
- Surface texture becomes inconsistent
- Washing helps temporarily but never fully restores original feel
I budget for 2-3 cloth pads per year if I'm maintaining competitive consistency. That's $100-200 annually just on surfaces.
Hard Pads Last Essentially Forever
My Skypad 3.0 after eight months looks and performs identically to new. The only maintenance is occasional cleaning with glass cleaner. The mouse feet will wear out long before the pad does.
Economically, a $100 glass pad that lasts five years costs less than $30 cloth pads replaced every four months. The math is straightforward.
Mouse Feet Wear Faster on Hard Surfaces
The trade-off: PTFE feet wear approximately 2-3x faster on glass than cloth. I replace feet every 4-5 months on glass versus 10-12 months on cloth.
This partially offsets the durability advantage, but only partially. Aftermarket feet cost $5-15 per set. The annual cost difference still favors hard pads for longevity-focused players.
Hard vs Soft: The Actual Comparison
| Factor | Hard Pads | Soft Pads | Who It Favors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glide Speed | Very fast to fast | Medium to slow | Depends on preference |
| Stopping Power | Minimal | Good to excellent | Soft wins for control |
| Consistency Over Time | Excellent | Degrades monthly | Hard wins clearly |
| Humidity Resistance | Immune | Varies significantly | Hard wins clearly |
| Tracking Aim | Superior | Good | Hard wins for tracking |
| Flick/Static Aim | Equal | Equal to slightly better | Tie or slight soft edge |
| Spray Control | Worse | Better | Soft wins for sprays |
| Comfort (Long Sessions) | Adequate with light mice | Superior | Soft wins for comfort |
| Durability | 3-5+ years | 3-6 months | Hard wins dramatically |
| Mouse Feet Wear | Fast | Slow | Soft wins |
| Sound | Louder scratching | Quiet | Soft wins |
| Price Per Year | ~$20-40 (pad + feet) | ~$100-150 (replacements) | Hard wins long-term |
Who Should Actually Switch to Hard in 2026
Yes, Switch If:
You primarily play aim trainers or tracking-heavy games (Apex, Overwatch). The tracking advantage on glass is real.
You live in a humid climate and hate inconsistent cloth. Glass solves this completely.
You're frustrated by cloth degradation and want consistent feel month after month.
You use a lightweight mouse (under 65g) and don't experience wrist discomfort on hard surfaces.
No, Stay on Cloth If:
You play CS2 or Valorant competitively and spray control matters for your ranked performance.
Comfort over multi-hour sessions is a priority.
You've tried hard pads before and disliked the feel—that preference probably won't change.
You're sensitive to the scratching sound hard surfaces create.
Try Hard for a Month If:
You're genuinely curious and willing to commit to the adjustment period. Most players need 2-3 weeks before hard pads feel normal.
You have the budget to buy a quality glass pad (Skypad, Venus, Superglide) rather than a cheap hard plastic.
Your current cloth pad is nearing end-of-life anyway and you're buying something new regardless.

Is It Actually a "Comeback" or Just a Niche?
I've been framing this as a hard pad resurgence, and the market data supports that. Sales are up. More pro players are experimenting with glass. The products available in 2026 are genuinely good.
But let's be realistic: cloth will remain the default.
Most players don't care about durability enough to sacrifice comfort. Most players aren't chasing tracking scores in aim trainers. Most players buy one mouse pad when they build a PC and don't think about it again for years.
The hard pad "comeback" is real for the enthusiast segment—players reading articles like this, optimizing their setups, tracking their aim stats. For the broader gaming market? Cloth isn't going anywhere.
What I think will happen: hard pads become a legitimate second option rather than a weird niche. Players who discover glass and like it will stick with it. Players who prefer cloth will keep using cloth without feeling like they're missing something.
That's probably the right outcome.
My Current Setup After All This Testing
For transparency: I'm back on cloth as my primary.
After six months of genuine effort, glass never stopped feeling slightly wrong to me. The performance benefits were real but didn't outweigh the subjective discomfort and spray control deficit.
My current pad is an Artisan Zero Mid. I replace it every four months. I accept this cost.
That said, I keep the Skypad on my secondary setup for aim trainer warmups. The tracking benefits are real, and for pure practice scenarios where I'm not spraying, it works great.
If I lived somewhere more humid, I might make a different choice. If I mained Apex instead of CS2, I might make a different choice. The "right" answer depends on specifics I can't assume about your situation.
Player Questions That Actually Matter
Do hard pads damage mouse sensors or feet faster?
Sensors are fine—modern optical sensors handle any surface. Feet wear significantly faster on glass, roughly 2-3x the rate of cloth. Budget for replacement feet every 4-6 months if you switch to hard. Tiger Ice and Corepadz are popular aftermarket options.
Can I use glass feet on a cloth pad to get hard pad speed?
Sort of. Glass feet on cloth create a faster experience than PTFE on cloth, but it's not the same as glass-on-glass. You lose some of the consistency benefit, and the friction characteristics are different. Worth experimenting if you want more speed without fully committing to hard surfaces.
Will my muscle memory break if I switch between hard and soft?
Temporarily, yes. Most players report 1-2 weeks of adjustment when switching surface types. After that, you adapt. Some players successfully alternate between hard (for aim training) and soft (for competitive games) without issues, though I found this annoying personally and preferred consistency.